I don't think anyone here disputes that HIT can give people results ( Michigan is an excellent example). The problem most people in the industry have is the HIT zealots who, despite lots of research against them still try to claim that HIT is superior to all other forms of of training protocols. I think HIT is better than nothing, and if I were advisiing for example, a high school teacher, who also volunteered as a coach for an afternoon lifting program, I might advocate HIT due to it's simplicity and relatively low injury risk. With trained athletes, or a well organized and structured program how ever, I would not ever recommend HIT
Phillip Garrison CSCS *D
Mesa,AZ
Mesa Community College
============
To: Supertraining@
Dogma, with no support. Dan PartellyOradea, Romania--- In Supertraining@
============
http://groups.yahoo.com/mygroups
Sign all letters with full name & city of residence if you
wish them to be published!
Earn your degree in as few as 2 years - Advance your career with an AS, BS, MS degree - College-Finder.net.
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch format to Traditional
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
__,_._,___
0
comments
March









0 comments: