[Supertraining] Re: High Intensity Training?

Thursday, 10 January 2008      0 comments

I don't think anyone here disputes that HIT can give people results ( Michigan is an excellent example). The problem most people in the industry have is the HIT zealots who, despite lots of research against them still try to claim that HIT is superior to all other forms of of training protocols. I think HIT is better than nothing, and if I were advisiing for example, a high school teacher, who also volunteered as a coach for an afternoon lifting program, I might advocate HIT due to it's simplicity and relatively low injury risk. With trained athletes, or a well organized and structured program how ever, I would not ever recommend HIT

Phillip Garrison CSCS *D
Mesa,AZ
Mesa Community College

===========================

To: Supertraining@yahoogroups.comFrom: dan_partelly@yahoo.comDate: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 21:12:09 +0000Subject: [Supertraining] Re: High Intensity Training?

Dogma, with no support. Dan PartellyOradea, Romania--- In Supertraining@yahoogroups.com, "Drew Baye" <drew@...> wrote:>> John Cowell asked:> > "Honestly, is there anyone out there who truly believes that a single> set protocol is superior to a multi-set protocol for strength, power> or hypertrophy gains?"> > > In most cases, yes, if for no other reason than it will produce similar> results with less time invested. Like many things, however, itdepends on> the individual.> > Drew Baye> Orlando, FL> www.baye.com>

================================

__._,_.___
Modify/cancel your subscription at:

http://groups.yahoo.com/mygroups

Sign all letters with full name & city of residence if you
wish them to be published!

Recent Activity
Visit Your Group
Yahoo! Health

Fit for Life

Getting fit is now

easier than ever.

New web site?

Drive traffic now.

Get your business

on Yahoo! search.

Biz Resources

Y! Small Business

Articles, tools,

forms, and more.

.

__,_._,___

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

0 comments: