[Supertraining] Can the fastest movement be more spatially accurate than a slightly slower one?

Wednesday, 23 January 2008      0 comments

Hi everyone,

Just finished reading Schmidt's book on Motor learning and performance.
He stated that "with the shortest time (i.e., 80 ms) actually producing
less spatial error than the next shorter time (i.e., 102 ms). This
finding is contrary to the strict view of the speed-accuracy trade-off,
in which faster movements are always less spatially accurate".

If I understand this correctly, it would mean that driving a golf ball
max or near maximum effort should be more accurate than - let's say 70%
speed?

This does not feel right. Is there any experiments on accuracy and it's
relations to force?

Hannu Leinonen
Jyväskylä, Finland

__._,_.___
Modify/cancel your subscription at:

http://groups.yahoo.com/mygroups

Sign all letters with full name & city of residence if you
wish them to be published!

Recent Activity
Visit Your Group
Meditation and

Lovingkindness

A Yahoo! Group

to share and learn.

Yahoo! Health

Memory Loss

Are you at risk

for Alzheimers?

Drive Traffic

Sponsored Search

can help increase

your site traffic.

.

__,_._,___

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

0 comments: