Hi everyone,
Just finished reading Schmidt's book on Motor learning and performance.
He stated that "with the shortest time (i.e., 80 ms) actually producing
less spatial error than the next shorter time (i.e., 102 ms). This
finding is contrary to the strict view of the speed-accuracy trade-off,
in which faster movements are always less spatially accurate".
If I understand this correctly, it would mean that driving a golf ball
max or near maximum effort should be more accurate than - let's say 70%
speed?
This does not feel right. Is there any experiments on accuracy and it's
relations to force?
Hannu Leinonen
Jyväskylä, Finland
http://groups.yahoo.com/mygroups
Sign all letters with full name & city of residence if you
wish them to be published!
Earn your degree in as few as 2 years - Advance your career with an AS, BS, MS degree - College-Finder.net.
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch format to Traditional
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
__,_._,___
0 comments: