0
comments
It seems to me that each of us has their own opinion on this topic. That being the case it is obvious nobody from either side of the issue is going to change the mind(s) of those on the other side. Why not agree to disagree and use what works for each of us in whatever format, protocol or system whether it be 1 set, multiple sets or HIT. If the individual is happy with the results does it really matter if someone else feels it is not the proper type of training?
Lee Robillard
Mississauga , Ontario
Canada
============
John Casler <bioforce.inc@
The majority does what the majority does. I have used 1 set Protocol for
nearly 30 years and many of my contemporaries have done multiple sets based
on
the given tradition of DeLorme's PRE and the Webster Technique and they are
not
better, just more beaten up. I have gotten what I've paid for and have
spent one 20th of the time getting it. You can work out long, you can work
out
hard - but you can't do both. Make your choice - less as far as I am
concerned
is more.
David Landau
John Casler writes:
Hi David,
I would tend to disagree. Less "IS NOT" more.
The "correct and adequate" amount of stimulus is what is needed for the best
result to a goal.
To supply this, requires examination of the stimuli to create the desired
response.
============
http://groups.yahoo.com/mygroups
Sign all letters with full name & city of residence if you
wish them to be published!
Earn your degree in as few as 2 years - Advance your career with an AS, BS, MS degree - College-Finder.net.
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch format to Traditional
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
__,_._,___
March
0 comments: